比赛概览

The 2. Bundesliga clash on 06/11/2026 pits Dynamo Dresden (11th, 41 pts) against SpVgg Greuther Fürth (16th, 37 pts) at 17:30. Both teams are fighting to climb out of the lower half, and the AI model highlights a tightly contested encounter.

近期状态与交锋记录

Dynamo Dresden arrive with a WLWLW run, showing a blend of resilience and occasional lapses. Greuther Fürth’s recent form is WLDLW, indicating a slightly more volatile pattern. In their last 25 meetings, Dresden hold a 12‑2‑11 record while Fürth sit at 9‑5‑11, suggesting Dresden have a marginal edge historically.

统计深度分析

每场进球数: Dresden 2.25, Fürth 1.37 – Dresden are a clear attacking force.
每场失球数: Dresden 1.31, Fürth 1.52 – Dresden also keep the net tighter.
每场射门数: Dresden 12.6, Fürth 14.7 – Fürth generate slightly more attempts, but Dresden’s conversion rate is higher.
角球: Dresden 6.3, Fürth 6.7 – similar set‑piece volume.
卡片: Dresden 1.8, Fürth 1.2 – Dresden play a bit more aggressively.

In the last five matches Dresden have averaged 1.0 goal while conceding 1.6, a clean‑sheet rate of just 20%. Fürth match the 1.0 goal average but concede only 1.2, with a 30% clean‑sheet rate, hinting at a more stable defence.

AI 胜率概率

Victory Dynamo Dresden: 49%
Draw: 25%
Victory Greuther Fürth: 26%

The AI assigns a higher win probability to Dresden despite their modest away record, driven by superior attacking metrics and a favourable head‑to‑head history.

预期进球（xG）与比分

xG: Dresden 1.34 – Fürth 1.79. The model expects Fürth to create slightly better chances, yet Dresden’s higher conversion efficiency tilts the balance.
最可能的比分: ?‑2（AI 预测 Fürth 将以低比分获胜，但胜率倾向 Dresden，反映了固有的不确定性）。
Over/Under: Over 2.5 goals 61%, Over 3.5 38%, Over 1.5 83%.
两队进球（BTTS）: 63%.
角球: 10.7 total, 卡片: 4.4 total.

投注市场分析

Bookmakers list Dresden at 1.88, draw at 3.73 and Fürth at 3.62, implying implied probabilities of 53%, 27% and 28% respectively. The AI model’s win odds translate to an implied 49% for Dresden, 25% for a draw and 26% for Fürth. The market therefore over‑values Dresden’s win chance by about 4 points and under‑prices the draw.

博彩公司失误点

1. 防守稳固性 – The AI highlights Dresden’s higher goals‑conceded rate in the last five games (1.6) versus Fürth’s 1.2, a nuance not fully reflected in the odds. 2. 射门质量 – While Fürth fire more shots, Dresden’s shot‑to‑goal conversion is superior (2.25 g/12.6 shots ≈ 17.9% vs 1.37 g/14.7 shots ≈ 9.3%). Bookmakers often ignore conversion efficiency. 3. 零封率差异 – Dresden’s 20% clean‑sheet rate versus Fürth’s 30% suggests a higher probability of a low‑scoring Fürth win, yet the market le